The other day I received an e-mail from Professor Rebus. Who? What? Who is Professor Rebus I hear you ask? Well, he's not a 'professor'. No, he is the creator of the Pitcherwits puzzle, a mixture of formal cryptic crossword puzzle clues and image clues. In his e-mail he asks for those subscribers to write, in this case, an article about 'your life' philosophy. Here is what I wrote.
Well, mine is based on three key teachings of that man who
lived about 2,500 years ago in Northern India: the Buddha. In his Three Marks
of Existence teaching, he stated that our everyday lives are conditioned by
impermanence (Pali: annica), suffering (Pali; dukkha) and non-self (Pali:
annata). What does this actually mean in my life? If I separate myself from the
actual teachings I begin to acknowledge a wider picture of me and everything
around me. For instance, I decide to drive to my nearest supermarket for some
groceries. I'm about halfway there and my car breaks down. I get out of the
car, lift up the hood, and I find the engine's run out of oil. Damn! The effect
on my emotions turn from frustration to anger. Why, oh why, oh why? Had I
checked the oil level on that day, or the day before, or the previous week,
then this wouldn't have happened. The car engine, like everything else in life,
is subject to change.
This example of impermanence transforms into anguish,
torment, in other words, suffering. It's the whole pain of something happening
right out of the blue; the car breaking down, the mental trauma, in that moment
when life is going along just well, driving my beautiful silver Chrysler 300 to
the supermarket, listening to the sweet soul sounds on the radio - and then boom!
If the Buddha had been walking past my car that day he might have stopped,
looked at the car engine, and then me. I would have said, "Why, Buddha,
why did this have to happen? I'm frustrated!" To which the enlightened
being would have replied, "If you didn't own the car, you wouldn't have
broken down in the first place - simple!" In other words our very
belongings, our ownership of stuff, possessions, from the Chrysler to my
Samsung mobile, from my Hugo Boss three-piece suit to my Rolex Submariner
watch, they are all potential examples of change and suffering.
But, and lastly, what about the person who experiences all
this pain: according to Gautama, the non-self (annata)? Over the years I have
dug deep into the aspects of dukkha and annica and have a full understanding
about the interaction of the two. Where there is change, there is suffering and
vice-versa. But non-self? The Buddha basically stated, and based on a lifetime of meditation and teaching, the so-called self doesn’t exist. Yes, it’s a
difficult one to get one’s head around. But I have to say that I eventually
began to get it. If there is no ‘me’ then where will dukkha and annica attach
to? Absolutely! Forget this thing we call ‘me’ and ‘I’ and life begins to get a
bit easier, manageable, and uncomplicated. Because all of life’s suffering
originates in you, whoever you think you are.
I rest my case . . .